Overview:
This source was written by Daniel J Kelves and is called “Eugenics and Human Rights”. This site contains history information about who came up with eugenics, but most importantly it discussed how it interfered with human’s rights. Mr. Kelves doesn’t only focus in Europe but discusses the issues of eugenics all over the world, such as Canada, United States, and Europe. He clearly says that even though eugenics was greatly seen in with Germany and the Nazis, it wasn’t just occurring there but everywhere. The countries were all focused on hereditary traits in order to create better humans, in result creating a perfect country. The author of this article defends his argument by using the example of the “Buck vs. Bell” case. In that case the fight was against sterilization law and eugenics, at the end, the court declared that it is done to protect the health of the state. Kelves also defends his argument of human rights by quoting Justice Oliver W. Holmes “the argument of freedom or right of the individual can no longer hold good where the welfare of the state and society is concerned”. With this quote the author clearly wins his argument due to the fact that the court believed that if they don’t allow science to take over in order to have a healthy state they must continue with sterilization and eugenics instead of human’s rights.
Argument:
The argument of this site is how eugenics was stepping on human’s rights. Kelves states that many people believed that a human’s rights should be valued much more than those of approved by science and social needs. This article doesn’t focus on choosing a side to defend but does encourage viewing the ways in which the law of science, eugenics in this case, was being valued much higher than a human’s right. This article also contains a bibliography of the sources he used to provide his information.
Source:
The author of this site is a professor, Daniel J. Kelves. This site is a reliable source because it is an article that was approved and has been copyrighted. This article does not seem to be bias but instead more of an informative article, with information and details of how eugenics was being put before human rights and about the history of eugenics. Not only does it give history but it gives information of when laws were being passed and when the laws were passed. Overall, this is a very reliable and good source.